Link 25 Jun 6 notes Glenn Greenwald On Why Privacy Is Vital, Even If You 'Have Nothing To Hide'»

kenyalatestnews:

LOS ANGELES — Journalist Glenn Greenwald defended the value of digital privacy and slammed those who dismiss its importance during a stop on his national book tour Thursday.

“We all need places where we can go to explore without the judgmental eyes of other people being cast upon us,” he said. “Only in a realm where we’re not being watched can we really test the limits of who we want to be. It’s really in the private realm where dissent, creativity and personal exploration lie.”

He said that people who downplay the importance of privacy typically say, “I have nothing to hide.” But, he added, those people aren’t willing to publish their social media and email passwords.

Greenwald published a series of stories last year based on leaked documents on United States surveillance from former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden. He recently published the book No Place to Hide about the fallout from Snowden’s actions.

“When we think we’re being watched, we make behavior choices that we believe other people want us to make,” he said. “It’s a natural human desire to avoid societal condemnation. That’s why every state loves surveillance — it breeds a conformist population.”

Greenwald went on to lambaste journalists, politicians and business leaders who have said that digital privacy is unnecessary. He criticized Google chairman Eric Schmidt for saying on CNBC in 2008 that “if you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place.” Greenwald argued that it’s detrimental to assume that someone who wants privacy — say a person calling an HIV clinic or suicide hotline — should be treated with suspicion.

“There are all kinds of things we want to hide from other people — that we tell our psychiatrist, our lawyer, our doctor, our spouse or a stranger on the Internet — that have nothing to do with criminality,” he said.

Greenwald also took on Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) for her 2013 op-ed in USA Today, in which she said that collecting call records doesn’t count as surveillance if the actual conversations aren’t recorded. At the time, some people responded online by calling for her to publish a list of people whom she spoke to every day. “Of course, she would never do that,” Greenwald said.

He also scorched MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell, The Washington Post’s Ruth Marcus and The New Yorker’s Hendrik Hertzberg, who all said last year that they don’t feel threatened by the NSA’s surveillance.

“If you look at those people, they all have something in common. They wake up every day and defend the people with the most power,” he said. “Of course they’re not threatened. They’re right — they probably don’t have anything to worry about.”

“You will never hear, ‘Oh, I’m not interested in privacy’” among people who work for places like Wikileaks or the Occupy movement, he added. We all value privacy, he said, but it is especially crucial for dissidents and targeted groups — and anyone who might fall into those categories in the future.
via WorldPost News on The Huffington Post

Photo 24 Jun 248 notes america-wakiewakie:

Israel elected to leadership of UN committee on “Decolonization” | Electronic Intifada 
Just when it appeared that the United Nations could not be more ineffective in protecting Palestinian rights and holding Israel accountable for violating them, here comes the news that Israel has been elected as vice-chair of the UN Special Commitee on Decolonization – which deals among other things with matters related to Palestinian refugees.
According to UN minutes, the representative of Israel, the world’s last settler-colonial power, received 74 votes for the post, despite strong opposition from the Arab Group of UN member states.
Qatar, speaking on behalf of the Arab states, described Israel as a “State that violated the United Nations Charter and international law. Because its track record was rife with murder and its occupation had lasted more than 66 years, Israel was not qualified to preside over questions pertaining to Palestinian refugees, peacekeeping and the investigation of its own illegal practices.”
The Arab states had demanded a recorded vote, an unusual step, prompting objections from the ambassador of the United Kingdom which is a member of the Group of Western European and Other States that nominated Israel.
Canada took the opportunity to express its “unflinching support for Israel” and the United States said it “unequivocally supported Israel’s election.”
Saudi Arabia – whose own membership of the UN Human Rights Council has drawn much criticism – said that Israel’s election was “the moral equivalent of placing the apartheid regime of South Africa in charge of a committee to end racism.”
Theater of the absurd
Israel thanked its supporters, but perhaps its actions spoke louder than words. While this theater of the absurd was playing out in New York, Israeli occupation forces stepped up demolitions of Palestinian homes to make way for colonial settlements.
Its election comes just weeks after Israel announced yet another massive expansion of illegal colonies in the occupied West Bank.
On Wednesday alone, Israeli demolitions left seven Palestinian families homeless in the West Bank.
And take a look at the photostory by Silvia Boarini documenting Israel’s ongoing ethnic cleansing of Palestinian Bedouins in the southern Naqab (“Negev”) region of present-day Israel.
These latest measures of ethnic cleansing come amid Israel’s assault on West Bank cities over the past week, allegedly in search of three missing colonial settlers. Israel has so far abducted more than 300 Palestinians, raided 750 homes as well as dozens of charities and the Birzeit University campus.
If there were a UN Committee on How to Occupy and Colonize, Israel would indeed be the best candidate to lead it.
(Photo Credit: Saeed Qaq / APA images | Palestinians examine the ruins of buildings demolished by Israeli occupation forces in eastern Jerusalem, 2 June)

america-wakiewakie:

Israel elected to leadership of UN committee on “Decolonization” | Electronic Intifada 

Just when it appeared that the United Nations could not be more ineffective in protecting Palestinian rights and holding Israel accountable for violating them, here comes the news that Israel has been elected as vice-chair of the UN Special Commitee on Decolonization – which deals among other things with matters related to Palestinian refugees.

According to UN minutes, the representative of Israel, the world’s last settler-colonial power, received 74 votes for the post, despite strong opposition from the Arab Group of UN member states.

Qatar, speaking on behalf of the Arab states, described Israel as a “State that violated the United Nations Charter and international law. Because its track record was rife with murder and its occupation had lasted more than 66 years, Israel was not qualified to preside over questions pertaining to Palestinian refugees, peacekeeping and the investigation of its own illegal practices.”

The Arab states had demanded a recorded vote, an unusual step, prompting objections from the ambassador of the United Kingdom which is a member of the Group of Western European and Other States that nominated Israel.

Canada took the opportunity to express its “unflinching support for Israel” and the United States said it “unequivocally supported Israel’s election.”

Saudi Arabia – whose own membership of the UN Human Rights Council has drawn much criticism – said that Israel’s election was “the moral equivalent of placing the apartheid regime of South Africa in charge of a committee to end racism.”

Theater of the absurd

Israel thanked its supporters, but perhaps its actions spoke louder than words. While this theater of the absurd was playing out in New York, Israeli occupation forces stepped up demolitions of Palestinian homes to make way for colonial settlements.

Its election comes just weeks after Israel announced yet another massive expansion of illegal colonies in the occupied West Bank.

On Wednesday alone, Israeli demolitions left seven Palestinian families homeless in the West Bank.

And take a look at the photostory by Silvia Boarini documenting Israel’s ongoing ethnic cleansing of Palestinian Bedouins in the southern Naqab (“Negev”) region of present-day Israel.

These latest measures of ethnic cleansing come amid Israel’s assault on West Bank cities over the past week, allegedly in search of three missing colonial settlers. Israel has so far abducted more than 300 Palestinians, raided 750 homes as well as dozens of charities and the Birzeit University campus.

If there were a UN Committee on How to Occupy and Colonize, Israel would indeed be the best candidate to lead it.

(Photo Credit: Saeed Qaq / APA images | Palestinians examine the ruins of buildings demolished by Israeli occupation forces in eastern Jerusalem, 2 June)

Video 23 Jun 621 notes
Video 22 Jun 1,488 notes

ersatzcoward:

elladoll:

Tony Benn trying to have a conversation with David Cameron.

Perfect

RIP sir

(Source: st4nl3yb4ldwin)

Link 21 Jun 1,561 notes http://anarcho-queer.tumblr.com/post/89432213377»

murderwhitepeople:

kifakyahelou:

finalrepose:

sebsasstan:

This is a PSA that while you guys watched the World Cup, a terrorist organization kidnapped three Israeli teenagers (16, 16 and 19) on the night between Thursday (June 12th) and Friday (June 13rd) and we still…

(Source: hawkeyeinc)

Text 21 Jun 1,185 notes

redphilistine:

All you need to know about American foreign policy is that Secretary of State John Kerry, one of the highest officials in the US government, condemned the alleged kidnapping of 3 Israeli settlers but not one official has ever said anything about the 1,400 Palestinian minors that Israel has murdered and 8,000 it has detained (kidnapped?) since 2000.

Photo 19 Jun 16 notes jamesleerwc:

Meet The Native American Grandmother Who Just Beat The Washington R*dskins
The woman who was the driving force behind the cases that led the U.S. Patents and Trademarks Office to cancel the federal trademarks for the Washington Redskins Wednesday is 69-year-old grandmother and longtime Native American activist, Suzan Harjo. 
"Suzan has been fighting this since 1992. Native American people have been fighting this since 1972. … The reason it has come up recently is because Suzan has worked really hard to bring this in the public eye,” Amanda Blackhorse, one of the five Native American plaintiffs in the case filed before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, told Business Insider.
"She’s just a tremendous woman. She’s a strong Native American woman, and I’m so happy to have met her and to have been a part of all this because this is what we need to do," Blackhorse added. 
Harjo was born in Oklahoma and is of Cheyenne and Muscogee ancestry. In a conversation with Business Insider shortly after the U.S. Patents and Trademarks Office’s decision was announced, Harjo said she became involved with political activism while she was still in school.
"One time when I was in school, I was selected by our Cheyenne leadership to come to Washington with them. And when my family asked, ‘Why do you want her to go?’ They said, ‘Because she talks good and she ain’t afraid of nobody.’ So, those became resumé items," Harjo recounted.
In high school, Harjo was inspired to fight against what she describes as “racist stereotypes in American sports” because of an Oklahoma Native American activist named Clyde Warrior.
"He made a personal cause of getting rid of the mascot ‘Little Red’ at the University of Oklahoma," Harjo said of Warrior. "Most of the Indians in Oklahoma couldn’t stand ‘Little Red’ and we called him the dancing idiot. He was always portrayed by a white guy in Indian costume."
Little Red was eventually banished by University of Oklahoma President J. Herbert Hollomon in 1970.
According to Harjo, activists involved in the effort to eliminate Native American mascots always viewed the Washington Redskins football team as “the worst” offender.
"No matter where you went or what was the mascot fight of the moment in any locale, everyone would always say, ‘And the worst one is right there in the nation’s capital, the Washington team name,’" said Harjo. "It was the worst one, everyone pointed to it."
Harjo moved to Washington D.C. in 1974. Soon after her arrival, she said someone gave her and her husband tickets to a Redskins game.
"We’re football fans and we can separate the team name from the game, so we went to a game. And we didn’t stay for the game at all, because people started — someone said something, ‘Are you this or that?’ So, we started to answer, then people started like pulling our hair," explained Harjo. "And they would call us that name and it was very weird for us. So, we just left and never went to another game."
Harjo said her experience at the Redskins game “solidified” her opposition to stereotypical Native American sports mascots.
"That just solidified it for me because it wasn’t just namecalling, it was what the name had promoted," Harjo said. "That’s the example of what objectification is. You strip the person of humanity and they’re just an object and you can do anything.
"You can pull their hair! I wouldn’t even touch someone else!"
Harjo, who eventually became the first president of the Morning Star Institute, a D.C.-based national Native rights organization, began looking for ways to change the Redskins name. She said she settled on the strategy of trying to get the team’s trademark canceled after she was contacted by a Minneapolis lawyer named Stephen Baird in 1992.
According to Harjo, Baird was working on a law review article about his theory the Redskins’ trademark could be canceled based on a section of the U.S. Trademark Act prohibiting trademarks that “may disparage … persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols.” Harjo said Baird heard she had “looked at all sorts of causes of action, and not settled on any of them, and had been talking with various attorneys about ways that we could approach this.” When Baird called her, Harjo said his “first question” was why she rejected using the Patent and Trademark Office as a forum to fight the Redskins name.
"And I said, ‘I have no idea what you’re talking about,’" Harjo remembered with a laugh. "Once he explained his theory, I was so intrigued by his theory. It was very different from the kinds of things we’d been looking at. … It didn’t interfere with free speech, it wasn’t even forcing a decision. What it’s saying is, ‘Here’s what the federal government will or will not sanction.’ Because, it’s the federal government’s role to grant the exclusive privilege of making money off this name.”
After she decided to use Baird’s strategy, Harjo brought a case to the Patent and Trademark Office with herself as the plaintiff in 1992. Though she was initially victorious in 1999, the Redskins appealed in federal district court and eventually won due to something Harjo termed a “technicality” – the federal judge ruled Harjo was too old to be the plaintiff and should have brought the case closer to her 18th birthday.
"We wondered if she wasn’t, you know, a cheerleader for the team," Harjo said of the judge. "It turned out that she and her husband, actually they were regular attendees of the team games and her husband, his law firm had represented the team at one point."
As her case began to lose appeals, Harjo said she began organizing what she described as the “young people’s lawsuit” in 2005. She began watching protests against stereotypical mascots in order to recruit young Native Americans who were committed to the cause and could serve as plaintiffs in a new case that could not be appealed on the same grounds.
"It seemed like 18-24 … those were the brackets," said Harjo. "That’s what many courts had said about what constitutes young people."
Amanda Blackhorse was the first person recruited by Harjo. At the time she was 24 and had organized a protest at a game between the Redskins and the Kansas City Chiefs. Blackhorse is a Navajo woman who currently does social work with the Navajo Nation in Kayenta, Arizona. She told Business Insider her work in the community has reinforced her belief stereotypical sports mascots need to be eliminated.
"I have an interest in what we call historical trauma, the oppression that Native Americans went through and continue to go through has a tremendous effect on our mental health and our overall well being as people," Blackhorse said. "So, that is something that is my passion. … We need to work on healing our people and to also educate the public about the oppression that we have experienced and continue to experience, like these mascots."
Harjo said she was “very honest” with the five young people who joined the case about how difficult it would be to fight a legal battle against a pro-football team worth over a billion dollars.
"It’s not for everyone and I was frank about the kinds of pressures that they would be up against," said Harjo. "They go through your garbage and they hire P.I.’s. It’s a nasty business. They’re mean, and they’re big, and they have lots of money."
In addition to opposition from the team, Harjo said her work against the Redskins name has earned her death threats from the team’s supporters, some of whom she described as “fanatics.”
"Even if I’m here working right by the phone, I do not answer it even if I’m expecting a certain call at a certain time," Harjo said. “We get a lot of hangups and some of those, I just assume now, are the death threats. And some of them are just – I don’t want to hear people yelling at me even if they’re not exactly threatening my life. … I had to get a restraining order against one stalker who had developed a hostile fixation against me.”
Though Harjo’s “young people’s lawsuit” was filed in 2006, it was put on hold until Harjo’s attorneys exhausted all their remedies in the original case. Harjo said this occurred when the Supreme Court did not take up the case at the end of 2009.
Once the Patent and Trademark Office took up the new suit, Harjo said she was confident it would rule against the Redskins based on the fact the younger plaintiffs eliminated the “technicality” that caused her to lose her case on appeal.
"I was expecting it daily," she said. "I was expecting it and I was expecting a victory."
Harjo said she found out about the victory Wednesday morning after getting an email from the lead attorney on the case.
"Then almost immediately, my son and grandson called and the voice I heard on the answering machine was congratulations from my little grandson, which was wonderful," said Harjo.
After this victory, Harjo thinks other teams with offensive Native American mascots need to “get in line.”
"We’ve made tremendous progress. There were a little over 3,000 of these in 1970 and now there are just a little over 900," she explained. "So, we have eliminated over 2/3 of these racist stereotypes in American sports."
Harjo is particularly adamant that the Cleveland Indians baseball team needs to get rid of its mascot.
"I mean, Chief Wahoo is really the graphic equivalent of the name of the Washington team," said Harjo.
However, Harjo said she doesn’t necessarily need to do anything for the anti-mascot movement to notch another victory in Cleveland. Based on the precedent this case established, she said other Native Americans can get trademarks cancelled without a lawsuit.
"They would just have to write a letter and say we’re in the same position … and we want the same internal ruling and it would be changed very easily," Harjo said. "Happily, I don’t have to do anything. I mean there are people, lots of Native and non-Native people in Cleveland who want to get rid of that name and those images and are working in that direction. So, they’re going to do what they will with or without me."
Harjo said a major change that has occurred in recent years is that the push to eliminate Native American mascots is no longer “just one person’s fight.”
"I have had the privilege of being the kind of the face of this fight, but I stand for lots and lots of people who are either vocal about it, or who want to be a part of it, or who are a part of it. This is not a small group of people," said Harjo. "Now, it’s their fight. … We’ve said now is the time for everyone to just jump into this so that it’s not on the backs of a few people, especially a few young Native people." [x]

jamesleerwc:

Meet The Native American Grandmother Who Just Beat The Washington R*dskins

The woman who was the driving force behind the cases that led the U.S. Patents and Trademarks Office to cancel the federal trademarks for the Washington Redskins Wednesday is 69-year-old grandmother and longtime Native American activist, Suzan Harjo. 

"Suzan has been fighting this since 1992. Native American people have been fighting this since 1972. … The reason it has come up recently is because Suzan has worked really hard to bring this in the public eye,” Amanda Blackhorse, one of the five Native American plaintiffs in the case filed before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, told Business Insider.

"She’s just a tremendous woman. She’s a strong Native American woman, and I’m so happy to have met her and to have been a part of all this because this is what we need to do," Blackhorse added. 

Harjo was born in Oklahoma and is of Cheyenne and Muscogee ancestry. In a conversation with Business Insider shortly after the U.S. Patents and Trademarks Office’s decision was announced, Harjo said she became involved with political activism while she was still in school.

"One time when I was in school, I was selected by our Cheyenne leadership to come to Washington with them. And when my family asked, ‘Why do you want her to go?’ They said, ‘Because she talks good and she ain’t afraid of nobody.’ So, those became resumé items," Harjo recounted.

In high school, Harjo was inspired to fight against what she describes as “racist stereotypes in American sports” because of an Oklahoma Native American activist named Clyde Warrior.

"He made a personal cause of getting rid of the mascot ‘Little Red’ at the University of Oklahoma," Harjo said of Warrior. "Most of the Indians in Oklahoma couldn’t stand ‘Little Red’ and we called him the dancing idiot. He was always portrayed by a white guy in Indian costume."

Little Red was eventually banished by University of Oklahoma President J. Herbert Hollomon in 1970.

According to Harjo, activists involved in the effort to eliminate Native American mascots always viewed the Washington Redskins football team as “the worst” offender.

"No matter where you went or what was the mascot fight of the moment in any locale, everyone would always say, ‘And the worst one is right there in the nation’s capital, the Washington team name,’" said Harjo. "It was the worst one, everyone pointed to it."

Harjo moved to Washington D.C. in 1974. Soon after her arrival, she said someone gave her and her husband tickets to a Redskins game.

"We’re football fans and we can separate the team name from the game, so we went to a game. And we didn’t stay for the game at all, because people started — someone said something, ‘Are you this or that?’ So, we started to answer, then people started like pulling our hair," explained Harjo. "And they would call us that name and it was very weird for us. So, we just left and never went to another game."

Harjo said her experience at the Redskins game “solidified” her opposition to stereotypical Native American sports mascots.

"That just solidified it for me because it wasn’t just namecalling, it was what the name had promoted," Harjo said. "That’s the example of what objectification is. You strip the person of humanity and they’re just an object and you can do anything.

"You can pull their hair! I wouldn’t even touch someone else!"

Harjo, who eventually became the first president of the Morning Star Institute, a D.C.-based national Native rights organization, began looking for ways to change the Redskins name. She said she settled on the strategy of trying to get the team’s trademark canceled after she was contacted by a Minneapolis lawyer named Stephen Baird in 1992.

According to Harjo, Baird was working on a law review article about his theory the Redskins’ trademark could be canceled based on a section of the U.S. Trademark Act prohibiting trademarks that “may disparage … persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols.” Harjo said Baird heard she had “looked at all sorts of causes of action, and not settled on any of them, and had been talking with various attorneys about ways that we could approach this.” When Baird called her, Harjo said his “first question” was why she rejected using the Patent and Trademark Office as a forum to fight the Redskins name.

"And I said, ‘I have no idea what you’re talking about,’" Harjo remembered with a laugh. "Once he explained his theory, I was so intrigued by his theory. It was very different from the kinds of things we’d been looking at. … It didn’t interfere with free speech, it wasn’t even forcing a decision. What it’s saying is, ‘Here’s what the federal government will or will not sanction.’ Because, it’s the federal government’s role to grant the exclusive privilege of making money off this name.

After she decided to use Baird’s strategy, Harjo brought a case to the Patent and Trademark Office with herself as the plaintiff in 1992. Though she was initially victorious in 1999, the Redskins appealed in federal district court and eventually won due to something Harjo termed a “technicality” – the federal judge ruled Harjo was too old to be the plaintiff and should have brought the case closer to her 18th birthday.

"We wondered if she wasn’t, you know, a cheerleader for the team," Harjo said of the judge. "It turned out that she and her husband, actually they were regular attendees of the team games and her husband, his law firm had represented the team at one point."

As her case began to lose appeals, Harjo said she began organizing what she described as the “young people’s lawsuit” in 2005. She began watching protests against stereotypical mascots in order to recruit young Native Americans who were committed to the cause and could serve as plaintiffs in a new case that could not be appealed on the same grounds.

"It seemed like 18-24 … those were the brackets," said Harjo. "That’s what many courts had said about what constitutes young people."

Amanda Blackhorse was the first person recruited by Harjo. At the time she was 24 and had organized a protest at a game between the Redskins and the Kansas City Chiefs. Blackhorse is a Navajo woman who currently does social work with the Navajo Nation in Kayenta, Arizona. She told Business Insider her work in the community has reinforced her belief stereotypical sports mascots need to be eliminated.

"I have an interest in what we call historical trauma, the oppression that Native Americans went through and continue to go through has a tremendous effect on our mental health and our overall well being as people," Blackhorse said. "So, that is something that is my passion. … We need to work on healing our people and to also educate the public about the oppression that we have experienced and continue to experience, like these mascots."

Harjo said she was “very honest” with the five young people who joined the case about how difficult it would be to fight a legal battle against a pro-football team worth over a billion dollars.

"It’s not for everyone and I was frank about the kinds of pressures that they would be up against," said Harjo. "They go through your garbage and they hire P.I.’s. It’s a nasty business. They’re mean, and they’re big, and they have lots of money."

In addition to opposition from the team, Harjo said her work against the Redskins name has earned her death threats from the team’s supporters, some of whom she described as “fanatics.”

"Even if I’m here working right by the phone, I do not answer it even if I’m expecting a certain call at a certain time," Harjo said. “We get a lot of hangups and some of those, I just assume now, are the death threats. And some of them are just – I don’t want to hear people yelling at me even if they’re not exactly threatening my life. … I had to get a restraining order against one stalker who had developed a hostile fixation against me.”

Though Harjo’s “young people’s lawsuit” was filed in 2006, it was put on hold until Harjo’s attorneys exhausted all their remedies in the original case. Harjo said this occurred when the Supreme Court did not take up the case at the end of 2009.

Once the Patent and Trademark Office took up the new suit, Harjo said she was confident it would rule against the Redskins based on the fact the younger plaintiffs eliminated the “technicality” that caused her to lose her case on appeal.

"I was expecting it daily," she said. "I was expecting it and I was expecting a victory."

Harjo said she found out about the victory Wednesday morning after getting an email from the lead attorney on the case.

"Then almost immediately, my son and grandson called and the voice I heard on the answering machine was congratulations from my little grandson, which was wonderful," said Harjo.

After this victory, Harjo thinks other teams with offensive Native American mascots need to “get in line.”

"We’ve made tremendous progress. There were a little over 3,000 of these in 1970 and now there are just a little over 900," she explained. "So, we have eliminated over 2/3 of these racist stereotypes in American sports."

Harjo is particularly adamant that the Cleveland Indians baseball team needs to get rid of its mascot.

"I mean, Chief Wahoo is really the graphic equivalent of the name of the Washington team," said Harjo.

However, Harjo said she doesn’t necessarily need to do anything for the anti-mascot movement to notch another victory in Cleveland. Based on the precedent this case established, she said other Native Americans can get trademarks cancelled without a lawsuit.

"They would just have to write a letter and say we’re in the same position … and we want the same internal ruling and it would be changed very easily," Harjo said. "Happily, I don’t have to do anything. I mean there are people, lots of Native and non-Native people in Cleveland who want to get rid of that name and those images and are working in that direction. So, they’re going to do what they will with or without me."

Harjo said a major change that has occurred in recent years is that the push to eliminate Native American mascots is no longer “just one person’s fight.”

"I have had the privilege of being the kind of the face of this fight, but I stand for lots and lots of people who are either vocal about it, or who want to be a part of it, or who are a part of it. This is not a small group of people," said Harjo. "Now, it’s their fight. … We’ve said now is the time for everyone to just jump into this so that it’s not on the backs of a few people, especially a few young Native people." [x]

via James Lee.
Text 17 Jun 577,306 notes

nudqe:

"white people can’t danc-"

image

"white people can’t twer-"

image

Hahaha. Look, it’s a dancing war criminal. Hahaha. So funny.

Photo 16 Jun 239,298 notes discourseofwalls:

fasttoslow:

This is important

This graphic is ridiculously effective and helpful.

discourseofwalls:

fasttoslow:

This is important

This graphic is ridiculously effective and helpful.

Chat 15 Jun 1,287 notes
  • Right libertarians: capitalism is voluntary
  • Working class: lmao
Photo 14 Jun 100,626 notes akeppleaday:

I can’t imagine why Google prefers their FIFA World Cup Doodles over my well-researched one. Oh well, their loss I guess.

akeppleaday:

I can’t imagine why Google prefers their FIFA World Cup Doodles over my well-researched one. Oh well, their loss I guess.

Video 13 Jun 68,514 notes

akeppleaday:

"Happy" World Cup, Brazil.

(Here are some sources.)

Photo 12 Jun 60,187 notes fuckyeahanarchopunk:

VICTORY! London activists poured concrete over anti-homeless spikes outside a supermarket early Thursday morning and now the company says they will remove the metal spikes entirely.

fuckyeahanarchopunk:

VICTORY! London activists poured concrete over anti-homeless spikes outside a supermarket early Thursday morning and now the company says they will remove the metal spikes entirely.

Text 12 Jun 5,101 notes

academicfeminist:

smootymormonhelldream:

Take the anti-homeless spikes and stab them through the hearts of every capitalist.

i like this idea

yes

good

Video 11 Jun 7,740 notes

kropotkink:

Capitalism

(Source: rosaluxmemeburg)


Design crafted by Prashanth Kamalakanthan. Powered by Tumblr.